Why This Matters

Resilience professionals are often asked, “Can we recover?”.  But the better question is, “Can we continue?”

This article is written for continuity and resilience leaders who want a practical way to evaluate their organization’s real capability to operate during disruption – within their defined risk appetite. Instead of theory or “BCP 101,” we will focus on specific, actionable steps to measure capability, identify gaps, and make the case for improvement.

If you have ever struggled to prove the true state of your organization’s resilience – or to explain it to leadership – this framework will help you do both.
________________________________________

1. What’s Changed: From Recovery Readiness to Continuity Capability

Most continuity programs measure readiness by recovery time objectives (RTOs). While useful, RTOs do not tell you how likely it is that those targets can be achieved when disruption hits.

Leaders today face complex, multi-layered risks: supply chain fragility, technology interdependence, and shifting risk appetites. Recovery times on paper do not reflect whether processes, people, and infrastructure can sustain operations long enough to meet those expectations.

The key shift: resilience is not about what happens after the event – it is about maintaining momentum through it.
________________________________________

2. Know What You are Measuring

You cannot assess resilience if you are unclear what it means for your organization. Every company defines “critical” differently – but your measurement framework should answer three questions:

• What must continue? Identify essential functions that directly protect revenue, reputation, or compliance.
• How ready are we to continue them? Evaluate dependencies (systems, people, vendors, data) and test if workarounds are viable.
• How does that align with our risk appetite? Determine whether current capabilities meet leadership’s tolerance for downtime or performance degradation.

Pro Tip: Many organizations mistake “plans” for “capability.” Having a BCP does not mean you can execute it. Test the difference.
________________________________________

3. Conduct a Capability Checkup

A simple, practical self-assessment across five capability areas will give you a snapshot of how well your organization can continue operations during stress:

You can score each on a 1-to-5 scale (1 = informal; 5 = optimized) to reveal maturity gaps and prioritize improvements.
________________________________________

4. Use Risk Appetite as Your Compass

Risk appetite defines the level of risk leadership is willing to accept – but it is rarely translated into continuity terms. Without that alignment, resilience decisions are made in a vacuum.

If your BIA shows a four-hour RTO but your current process or vendor cannot realistically recover for twelve, that is not a compliance issue – it is a risk appetite mismatch.

To correct this, link continuity metrics to enterprise risk metrics:

• Map each critical process to its operational risk tolerance.
• Convert qualitative appetite statements into quantitative tolerances (e.g., “no more than 4 hours of downtime for revenue operations”).
• Present capability gaps as risk exposures with cost, impact, and probability data.

That framing makes continuity maturity a business decision, not a technical argument.
________________________________________

5. Common Pitfalls – and How to Fix Them

❌ Pitfall 1: Siloed Programs

Fix: Create cross-functional reviews that connect continuity, crisis, ITDR, and risk. Shared metrics and joint exercises reduce surprises.

❌ Pitfall 2: Testing for Compliance

Fix: Move beyond pass/fail tabletop drills. Simulate realistic, high-pressure scenarios that validate decision-making and timing, not just documentation.

❌ Pitfall 3: Over-Engineering Solutions

Fix: Simplicity wins under stress. A 70% workable plan executed fast is better than a 100% perfect plan executed late.

❌ Pitfall 4: Weak Communication

Fix: Communicate early and often. When executives ask for updates, it is already late. Build proactive status cadence into your crisis communication playbook.
________________________________________

6. Actionable Steps to Build Proactive Resilience

Here are six practical steps readers can implement immediately:

1. Define what “continue” means for your business.
   Tie continuity outcomes directly to revenue, regulatory, and reputational objectives.
2. Align continuity targets with risk appetite.
   Ensure each function’s Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Maximum Tolerable Period of Disruption (MTPD) reflect leadership’s true risk tolerance — not just inherited assumptions. +
3. Quantify capability gaps.
   Use maturity scoring or readiness metrics to visualize where capabilities do not meet expectations.
4. Invest in integration.
   Crosstrain continuity, ITDR, and crisis management teams. The handoffs define your real readiness.
5. Practice for pressure.
   Replace scripted table-tops with dynamic exercises that test judgment, timing, and leadership communication.
6. Measure improvement.
   Reassess capability maturity annually – resilience should evolve as your risk landscape does.

________________________________________

7. Lessons from the Field

In over two decades of implementing and assessing continuity programs, the strongest organizations share three traits:

• They know their critical path. Everyone understands which processes and systems make or break operations.
• They train beyond the plan. Teams rehearse decisions, not just steps.
• They measure what matters. Success is defined by continuity of service, not completion of documentation.

These are not theoretical ideals – they are practical disciplines that have proven effective under pressure, from cyber incidents to supply chain disruptions.
________________________________________

8. Key Takeaways

After reading this article, readers should be able to:

• Identify and assess true continuity capability – not just recovery potential.
• Use risk appetite as a decision-making tool for prioritizing resilience investments.
• Implement actionable, cross-functional improvements that enhance continuation, not just restoration.

________________________________________

Conclusion: Build Confidence, Not Just Compliance

Resilience is not measured by how well you restore systems – it is measured by how confidently you continue serving customers when others cannot.

By moving from reactive recovery to proactive capability, continuity leaders can position resilience as a strategic advantage – one grounded in data, discipline, and readiness.

The next time you are asked, “Can we recover?”
Be ready to answer, “Yes – but more importantly, we can continue.”
________________________________________